|
Archives - $300,000 eMail blocked
- [SC-Help] Re:BUSINESS INTERFERENCE
Subject: [SC-Help] Re:BUSINESS INTERFERENCE
From: Socks the Whitehouse Cat agent01413@my-deja.com
Date: Fri Jul 25 22:53:17 EDT 2003
Counter: 1334
| Giving up the right to remain silent, Randolf Richardson <rr@8x.ca> said in news:Xns93C258960A8D8rr8xca at 216.154.195.61:
> [sNip] >>>> you blocked my mail and i lost a sale for a $300,000 contract >>>> because i missed a deadline >>>> YOU WILL BE HEARING FROM MY ATTORNEY >>> >>> Gee another threat of a "lawsuite", SpamCop works so well!! >> >> anyone notice that the IPA he posted from is only listed by Eric's >> XBL? > > Who's Eric? >
class=ext target=_blank>http://xbl.selwerd.cx/
The most aggressive dnsbl going, in the view of alot of people, including this study which on July 12 showed him blocking just shy of four times as much mail as spamcop:
class=ext target=_blank>http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html
It's generally accepted that his high spam blocking count comes with a concommitent high false positive count.
-- In either case, the Court cautions Plaintiff's counsel not to run with a sharpened writing utensil in hand--he could put his eye out. (147 F.Supp.2d 668)
|
Message hierarchy
|
|